Reviews are ordered by language and date with a maximum of 25 reviews.
Delusions of grandeur, sub-Travelodge standards in general...
| Average rating: |
 |
4.0 |
Guest type: Spouse / significant other
stayed in Jun 2008
Stating with the positives - the location is pretty convenient, and the receptionists that dealt with us couldn't have been nicer. They also allowed us to have drinks after the bar was closed in a pretty courtyard just through reception which was good. Finally, the (second) room that we were given after complaining was at least a good size, if still rather shabby particularly in the bathroom (badly fitting and ancient lino, shower head bizarrely placed as if for a midget, fag burn in the dirty net curtains...) - it was also very stuffy and hot due to lack of aircon.
However... there are many more negatives. The whole hotel looked shabby and severely in need of a refurb. The first room we were put into was appalling - miniscule, airless, filthy (dust on all the surfaces, stained and burnt carpet and cracked lino), all accessorised with knackered old junk-shop furniture and right next to the road - it made me wheeze just being in there for 5 minutes. And they had the gall to charge ?90 a night for it! So we were moved by the receptionist and as I said above, this second room was a bit better, but still nowhere near the standard you'd expect of even a 3-star hotel. The cooked breakfast buffet was also pretty nasty and the staff who were in the dining room each morning were some of the most unprofessional I've seen in a hotel - giggling teenagers talking loudly about waxing people's eyebrows off with sellotape amongst other things, and consequently failing to give any thought to offering tea and coffee or toast, which weren't available at the buffet, to paying customers.
Basically, if they were charging sub-Travelodge prices, you'd be happy with sub-Travelodge accommodation and service (bar the receptionists). However frankly, at these prices (almost the same as the fantastic Stagg Inn at Kington at which we had stayed 2 weeks previously - only half an hour down the road!), I would find somewhere else to stay instead.
Guest name:franny192, London
My ratings for this hotel are:
8.0 Check in / front desk
2.0 Value
4.0 Service
4.0 Rooms
4.0 Location
2.0 Cleanliness
Good for one night (at least at half the price)
| Average rating: |
 |
8.3 |
Guest type: Friends
stayed in May 2008
I only stayed for one night at ?60 for the room, when the nearby Travelodge [a chain of basic hotels] wanted to charge ?55, and it was a very reasonable price to pay for what I got. The room was clean, the service friendly, and the breakfast very reasonable, at least by English standards. My minor quibbles are: 1) Room service is only available during mealtimes, which is a little useless! Only sandwiches can be ordered at any time, but when I tried at 4pm on a Saturday I was told there wouldn't be any "on the premises" until 5pm; 2) No free wifi, although there is a T-Mobile-run service advertised in the room, which I decided not to use; 3) The shower head is not detachable or otherwise adjustable, and set much lower than the average. I'm only 5'9" (173cm) in height myself, and I almost banged my head against it.
Overall, though, this seems to be a good hotel, at least for basic stays, and especially at the discount I received.
Guest name:slygent, Leamington Spa, United Kingdom
My ratings for this hotel are:
8.0 Check in / front desk
8.0 Value
8.0 Service
8.0 Rooms
8.0 Location
10.0 Cleanliness
Very enjoyable
| Average rating: |
 |
9.0 |
Guest type: Spouse / significant other
stayed in Mar 2008
Had a lovely and relaxing stay, at the Fownes Hotel.
Excellant location to explore Worcester.
Nice breakfast and great service.
Recommended!
Guest name:MandKLon, London
My ratings for this hotel are:
8.0 Check in / front desk
8.0 Value
10.0 Service
8.0 Rooms
10.0 Location
10.0 Cleanliness
Acceptable for one night
| Average rating: |
 |
4.9 |
Guest type: Solo traveler
stayed in Feb 2008
My heart sank when I saw the location next to a very busy ring road. In fairness, traffic noise was not a problem in the room. The whole place feels a bit neglected and dated. The public rooms and my bedroom all felt tired. The lighting in the bedroom was dim and made reading hard work. The staff were friendly but the whole place had a sightly ghostly feel as the ring road raced past. It last had a revamp circa 1983, I should say, and is long overdue another. I would certainly not stay here for pleasure and doubt I would return on business.
Guest name:HumphreyLondon, London
My ratings for this hotel are:
6.0 Check in / front desk
4.0 Business service
4.0 Value
6.0 Service
4.0 Rooms
4.0 Location
6.0 Cleanliness
A little bit dated....
| Average rating: |
 |
5.1 |
Guest type: Spouse / significant other
stayed in Jan 2008
There is not a lot of choice in the centre of Worcester for full service hotels so I suppose this explains why there is little incentive for the management to improve this hotel.
The hotel in clean but the rooms are creaky and very dated, with cheap fixtures and fittings. The breakfast was average buffet style and bar service was available after normal closing time but the service was not exactly warm and friendly!
The location is good however and with some updating this could be a lovely place to stay however I can only see this happening if one of the chains builds a full service hotel nearby and gives the management the kick into action that they need.
Guest name:Carol&Kevin, Washington, England
My ratings for this hotel are:
6.0 Check in / front desk
2.0 Business service
6.0 Value
4.0 Service
4.0 Rooms
8.0 Location
6.0 Cleanliness